阿里巴巴的发展历程中,马云从一个二三十人的企业,发展至几百人再到目前几万人的互联网集团。作为集团CEO,马云从早期的跟着员工工作在最前端到现在退居幕后,造成这样的变化是什么?
简单结构
一家小型零售商店、一家由创业者白手起家经营的电子公司和一家航空公司在飞行员罢工期间成立的“作战室” 答案也许是,它们很可能都使用简单结构
描述简单结构,与其说它是什么,不如说它不是什么。它的结构不复杂,部门化程度低,管理幅度宽,权力集中在一个人手中,正规化程度低。这是一种“扁平”的组织,通常仅有2~3个垂直层级,员工数量不固定,决策权集中在一个人手中。
大多数公司起步的时候都是采用简单结构,并且许多以创新技术为基础.在小型企业中,简单结构的应用最为广泛。在这种组织里,企业经营者与所有者通常为同一人。
简单结构的优势就在于它的简单性。它反应敏捷、灵活时变、运营成本低廉,而且责任明确。其主要缺陷在于,这种组织形式由于低正规化和高集权化,导致上层的信息负荷过重,难以适应组织扩展的需要。随着组织规模的扩大,如果经营者依然企图独揽大权,那么组织决策就会日渐迟缓,最终陷入停滞。这往往导致小型企业的毁灭。如果此时组织结构还不加以改变,使之变得更加精细,这个企业就会失去很多发展机会,甚至可能以失败告终。简单结构的另一个缺陷在于它的风险性,即一切都取决于一个人。事实上,一次危机就足以毁掉整个组织的信息与决策中心。
During Alibaba's development, Jack Ma has grown from a company of 20 to 30 people to an Internet group of several hundred people and then to tens of thousands of people. As the CEO of the group, Jack Ma has gone from working at the forefront with employees in the early days to retreating behind the scenes. What caused such a change?
Simple structure
A small retail store, an electronics company run by entrepreneurs from scratch, and an airline's "war room" set up during a pilot strike. The answer may be that they are likely to use simple structures
To describe a simple structure, it is better to say what it is not than what it is. It has a simple structure, low departmentalization, a wide management span, power concentrated in one person, and low formalization. It is a "flat" organization, usually with only 2 to 3 vertical levels, a variable number of employees, and decision-making power concentrated in one person.
Most companies start with a simple structure, and many are based on innovative technologies. Simple structures are most widely used in small businesses. In this organization, the business operator and the owner are usually the same person.
The advantage of a simple structure is its simplicity. It is responsive, flexible, has low operating costs, and clear responsibilities. Its main drawback is that this form of organization, due to its low formalization and high centralization, leads to an excessive information load on the upper level, making it difficult to adapt to the needs of organizational expansion. As the size of the organization expands, if the operator still attempts to monopolize power, then the organization's decision-making will become increasingly slow and eventually stagnant. This often leads to the destruction of small businesses. If the organizational structure is not changed at this time to make it more sophisticated, the company will lose many development opportunities and may even end in failure. Another drawback of a simple structure is its riskiness, that is, everything depends on one person. In fact, a crisis is enough to destroy the information and decision-making center of the entire organization.