Yesterday, the Hangzhou High-tech Zone (Binjiang) HR Think Tank Alliance was established. The first batch of members consisted of CHOs or HRDs from more than 30 key companies such as Alibaba, Hikvision, NetEase, and Geely. It aims to create a human resource sharing empowerment platform with the most "sense of mission, cohesion, and growth power". Through benchmark learning and experience sharing, it conducts cutting-edge research, jointly promotes innovative practices and value enhancement of human resource management, empowers corporate innovation and development, and creates a new talent development ecology like a tropical rainforest.

The publicity sounds really good, high-end and gimmicky. It consists of CHOs or HRDs from more than 30 key companies such as Alibaba, Hikvision, NetEase, and Geely. Of course, this is publicity from the perspective of capital, so what about from the perspective of a workplace person?

The author can make an extreme guess. In the future, the HRs in these alliances will directly record the level of those troublesome employees in their previous company, their work attitude, and their performance. Even the specific salary of this employee, the progress of salary increase, whether he is willing to work overtime, how many days he takes leave, etc. are all recorded one by one. Every person in the workplace is labeled with detailed labels like a piece of "pork", and HR recruits people to the system to directly screen according to the labels.

Speaking of this kind of alliance software, doesn't this constitute illegal collection of other people's private information? Isn't this illegal?

Establishing an alliance or labeling candidates may really be as good as the capitalists promote:

Through benchmarking learning, experience sharing, and cutting-edge research, we can jointly promote innovative practices and value enhancement of human resource management, empower corporate innovation and development, and create a new talent development ecology like a tropical rainforest.

But the author has to question this phenomenon. Today's workplace environment is bad. The author believes that there are such software and such alliances. There will definitely be no shortage of malicious labeling behind them. If you are labeled, will you not be able to find a job in Hangzhou? These bosses unite. If they suppress wages at the same time locally, do we have to accept any salary given by the company unconditionally?

The author is just a workplace self-media, and it is difficult to determine whether this behavior is illegal or not, but the author can quote a sentence from lawyer Yue Shanshan, whether it is the provider or the final buyer, it is illegal.

If it is actively provided for sale, I think it is a criminal act. Illegal provision obviously infringes on citizens' personal information, and the buyer also infringes on citizens' personal information;

The sale of citizens' personal information is often carried out on online platforms, which requires the platform to fulfill its main responsibility and report and complain to relevant departments;